Digital Money Demystified Digest Trend Report

February 19, 2024

Tonya M. Evans

Feb 19, 2024

The DMD Digest Trend Report — Powered by Advantage Evans Academy📈

GET THE BUNDLE

EVENTS

Feb: Black History Month Bookshelf Series »powered by BlackWebStreet
2/22: DMD Insider Member-Only Masterclass. “Everything You Need to Know About Crypto Taxes”.
2/26 Black Tech Achievements Awards | Professor Evans is a FinTech Person of the Year finalist! Winners announced at the Black Tie gala.
SAVE THE DATE: Women’s History Month Virtual Series in partnership with Harlem Book Fair and Harriett’s Bookshop, titled “Black Women & Wealth: Past, Present & Future. Each Thursday in March at 7:00 p.m. ET

Book me for your next training or event.

“BEST OF” BOOKS TO BOOST YOUR BOTTOM LINE

BROWSE OUR BOOKSHELF

‘Flood of money’ from crypto Super PACs could fund potential challenger to Elizabeth Warren

Crypto skeptic Elizabeth Warren suggested interest groups could “spend any amount of money needed” to attempt to stop her and Representative Katie Porter’s Senate runs.
Senator Elizabeth Warren suggested potential attacks on hers and Representative Katie Porter’s 2024 campaigns could be funded by “corporate money” connected to crypto supporters.
In an interview with Pod Save America released on Feb. 18, United States President Barack Obama’s former speechwriter, Jon Favreau, questioned Senator Warren on the “Republican crypto enthusiast” John Deaton, who was considering challenging the Massachusetts senator for her seat in the 2024 election. Senator Warren, an outspoken skeptic who has often linked digital assets with illicit activities, suggested “corporatists” could attempt to “spend any amount of money needed” to back challengers to her and Representative Porter.
“Your push to regulate [crypto] […]
🔗Continue Reading

Get in the Know! 🪙

On the Legal Front ⚖️

Book me for your next event or corporate training! Learn more

The Intersection of Blockchain, Policy, and Advocacy in Congress with Dave Grimaldi

🚀 Blockchain has unfortunately not yet been defined by its numerous important and consequential ‘pros’ but rather spotlighted in the news by the few debilitating high profile cons (pun intended). This puts us in the challenging position to reverse the perspective of skeptics in Congress to advocate for innovation-friendly policy and regulations that will advance this technology in a positive direction.